SOC 2
Readiness for Trust Services Criteria scope, control design, operating evidence, exceptions, and auditor handoff.
- System description inputs
- Control and evidence map
- Type I or Type II readiness plan
Map once, prepare deliberately
Frameworks overlap, but their formal outcomes do not. Canonical Plus maps reusable controls and evidence while preserving the distinct assessor, certification, authorization, legal, and regulatory paths required for each program.
Readiness for Trust Services Criteria scope, control design, operating evidence, exceptions, and auditor handoff.
Readiness for an information security management system, risk treatment, documented controls, and certification-body review.
Readiness for cardholder-data scope, technical requirements, evidence, compensating controls, and the applicable validation path.
Readiness for the selected impact level, NIST control baseline, documentation package, continuous monitoring, and approved assessor path.
Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover maturity assessment aligned to business risks.
Readiness mapping for security and privacy controls used by federal and other high-assurance programs.
Readiness for protecting controlled unclassified information, documenting implementation, and preparing for the required CMMC path.
Implementation-group-based readiness for foundational, enterprise, and higher-risk security safeguards.
Readiness for a business continuity management system, impact analysis, recovery objectives, exercises, and certification-body review.
Readiness for cloud control mapping, shared-responsibility evidence, and the selected STAR assurance level.
Security and privacy readiness for electronic protected health information and the organization’s covered-entity or business-associate role.
Operational privacy readiness across roles, lawful bases, rights handling, retention, vendors, transfers, and security measures.
Readiness to extend an information security management system with privacy-specific controller and processor controls.
Readiness for governance, risk management, incident handling, supply-chain controls, reporting, and accountability obligations.
Readiness for ICT risk, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party risk, and oversight requirements.
Use these short guides to prepare your first scoping conversation. They are non-exhaustive starting points, not complete control tests, legal determinations, or claims that a certification is available.
System-description inputs, scoped control/evidence map, open exceptions, and a Type I/II planning discussion with the independent CPA firm.
ISMS scope, risk-treatment artifacts, draft Statement of Applicability inputs, and certification-body readiness questions.
ePHI boundary, safeguards gap register, responsible owners, and a specialist legal/compliance review path. There is no general HHS HIPAA certification.
Data-flow and environment scope, prioritized control gaps, evidence inventory, and the appropriate independent validation path.
Current/target profiles, prioritized gap register, and implementation roadmap. The CSF is not itself an audit certificate.
Requirements and applicable versions must be confirmed for the customer's jurisdiction, contractual scope, and chosen independent reviewer.
Identity, access, change management, incident response, vendor management, risk assessment, asset inventory, logging, vulnerability management, and evidence operations often support multiple frameworks.
Scope rules, sampling periods, report formats, accreditation requirements, assessor qualifications, filing obligations, regulatory conclusions, and formal outcomes cannot be collapsed into one generic “compliance” result.
Customer security addenda, procurement requirements, internal standards, and sector-specific control sets can be mapped into the same readiness model, with the source and interpretation kept explicit.